|

Governments
throughout the European community are taking the climate change and environmental
concerns seriously. For the end-user, this results in more paperwork,
additional costs of production, more compliance, more auditing; the list
goes on. But the issue is a double-edged sword, undoubtedly. Consider
this: a little more than 15 years ago, the International Organization
for Standardization (ISO) introduced its Quality Standards. Although implementation
costs were high, most companies utilized them to improve their practices
- and that has proven to be of great benefit to all.
Companies implementing
changes to meet the requirements of the Climate Change Levy and recent
ISO 14001 policies (see sidebar) will benefit in the long-term. Not just
financially, but also in the sense of satisfaction that comes from efforts
to protect the environment. In the most mercenary of terms, companies
cannot afford to risk their image by not complying.
The Climate Change
Levy and ISO 14001 do fall short in some respects, and therefore are not
the complete solution. Burning fuel causes pollution, recycling paper
reduced it. But what about lubricants? Lubricants come from the same limited
reserves as fuels. Lubricants must be properly disposed of at the end
of their useful life. With todays emphasis on the use of synthetic
fluids, these are even more expensive, incurring greater loss of profits.
Know
Your Options
Do you know what your sites total sump and system capacities are?
Do you know what your annual lubricant consumption is? If you have access
to these numbers, figure the annual consumption ratio by dividing the
consumption by the capacity. This is most likely greater than three. Then
figure what proportion of that is leakage. These figures should be documented
and regularly updated.
Are you purchasing
lubricants based on an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specification,
or on your lubricant suppliers recommendations? Did your company
involve its maintenance group when evaluating your lubricant contract?
Setting lubricant specifications may require input from industry experts.
The OEM defines its specifications as a baseline for the average user.
Your site and applications are unique, so set the standards according
to your needs. It is you, not the OEM, who pays the price of failure.
As part of your companys
oil analysis program, how does maintenance handle a questionable oil sample?
Is the oil immediately replaced? Take responsibility for oil management
onsite. Proactive maintenance requires understanding and responding to
failure root causes through effective oil analysis. New oil is not the
answer to all problems.
Lubrication is the
lifeblood of industry. While money is important to maintain the economy,
would there be an economy without lubrication? The wheels of industry
would literally grind to a halt. Lubrication is as critical as fuel, as
critical as investment and as critical as staff to keep the cogs turning.
Take
Time to Learn
Understanding best practices lubricant management is financially rewarding.
Many companies which have reached world-class levels in lubrication management
have seen reductions of 80 percent in lubricant consumption, reductions
of 50 percent in unplanned downtime and equipment failure, and life extension
of three times the plants capital.
These companies have
seen additional benefits. The typical increases of 50 percent or more
in production output have been achieved. Increased demand in production
was met without building new plants. Their pricing was more competitive,
and profits increased. Maintenance budgets were typically reduced
by at least 40 percent without impacting reliability. The overall cost
of the lubricant per liter dropped dramatically. Consider the total cost
of the lubricant, including purchase costs, disposal or reclamation, handling,
administration, inventory, etc. A conservative estimate of the cost of
a mineral-based lubricant with everything added in is as much as three
times the purchase price.
The
Climate Change Levy Discount Scheme
In
April 2001, UK businesses became liable for the Climate Change
Levy (CCL), an energy tax that adds approximately 15 percent to
typical energy bills. Many intensive users of energy are able
to join Climate Change Levy Agreements to help lighten the effects
of this tax. Under these agreements, businesses that accept, and
subsequently meet energy reduction targets will receive an 80
percent levy discount until the year 2013. More than 40 CCL agreements
are in place.
Reference:
www.cclevy.com
|
Reducing
Power Consumption
One of the key benefits of a proactive maintenance strategy with a focus
on lubrication is the reduced demand in power. Some studies suggest that
as much as a five percent reduction in power consumption can be achieved
on well-lubricated systems. Consider the problem of increasing power demand
as equipment ages. With improved lubrication and contamination control,
wear is minimized, power loss is reduced, and the efficiency of the machinery
is better maintained.
Reducing
Lubricant Disposal
Using lubricants more effectively reduces the current demand on resources.
Liquid/gaseous fuels and lubricants are generally derived from the same
source. Reducing the consumption of both is necessary to protect the environment.
Not only must lubricant consumption be reduced, but because fuels burn
off, the disposal of emissions must also be controlled. When lubricants
are consumed, they remain in a liquid, potentially hazardous form that
must be disposed of correctly. There are alternatives to straight disposal,
such as rerefining or reclamation for other purposes such as fuels. However,
severely exhausted lubricants are often poor candidates for reclamation
because they contain harmful acids resulting from excessive oxidation.
Better management of the lubricants in service will ensure that they remain
at least fit for further use elsewhere.
Leakage management
is another key area to address, particularly in the case of outdoor or
mobile equipment. Consider a small drop of oil the size of a nickel leaking
at the rate of one drop per minute. That accumulates to more than two
liters of oil lost per day. In better-maintained systems, filters must
be changed out less frequently, also reducing the effects of oil waste
disposal.
Take
Responsibility
Everyone must take the responsibility to manage lubricants more effectively
by utilizing best practices onsite and corporate-wide. The ultimate responsibility
lies with the governing bodies, for it is their job to recognize the impact
of lubrication and how it effects the environment. Lobbying groups will
hopefully recognize their important role in this process.
End-users must educate
their staff, helping them to develop a lubricant-focused proactive maintenance
strategy. Seek an audit of your site by an independent expert to establish
a Lubricant Efficiency Index (LEI), and use these findings to establish
an improvement strategy. Implement the changes and monitor the site to
ensure that the LEI continues to improve. And while the public benefits
from your efforts at protecting the environment, your company can enjoy
the financial gains.
|
ISO
14001
Positive Features of the ISO 14001 Standard
ISO 14001, the environmental management system (EMS) standard, institutes
a systematic framework for incorporating environmental protection
into an overall management strategy. Proponents of the standard
are touting ISO 14001 as an important new policy tool for encouraging
proactive environmental management and fostering cooperation between
industry
and the regulatory community.
Several elements
of the ISO 14001 standard have positive implications for fostering
pollution prevention. First, it is likely that top-level management
will view ISO 14000 certification as a competitiveness issue rather
than as a cost of compliance issue. Second, the ISO 14001 standard
encourages a holistic approach to improving environmental performance,
and establishes a framework for continual improvement. Third, the
standard may foster innovative strategies for improving environmental
performance by encouraging all the employees of a given firm to
look for ways to reduce environmental impacts. Lastly, the standard
is prompting firms all over the world to consider their environmental
performance where they otherwise might have little incentive to
do so.
Negative
Features of the Current Standard
In its present form, ISO 14001 has several potential shortcomings
that may reduce its effectiveness in encouraging pollution prevention
and limit its ability to spur improvements in environmental performance.
To begin with, the standard is a management systems standard, not
a performance standard. Therefore, a firm is not actually required
to improve its environmental performance, and may be able to point
to ISO certification as proof of its commitment to protecting the
environment. Also, the ISO 14001 definition of prevention of pollution
fails to distinguish between pollution prevention and pollution
control. The standard should not promote inefficient strategies
of last-resort as pollution prevention. Lastly, the standards have
been developed without sufficient input from the environmental community
and public interest organizations, and the standard does not require
sufficient public disclosure of a firms environmental impacts.
Reference
Pringle,
J. (January 28, 1998). National Pollution Prevention Roundtable,
ISO 14000 Workgroup, White Paper. www.p2.org/iso.html#Toc409507607.a
|
|